剪切波弹性成像定量参数对良恶性乳腺肿块的鉴别及对乳腺癌术后复发的预测价值

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.200704

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨剪切波弹性成像定量参数对乳腺癌诊断和预后预测的作用。以乳腺癌患者60例作为观察组，乳腺良性结节患者60例作为对照组，利用剪切波弹性成像行超声检查，收集最大弹性模量值（Emax）。t检验分析两组Emax差异，并使用ROC曲线分析Emax诊断乳腺癌的价值。结果显示，与对照组比较，观察组AE-max、Shell1Emax、Shell2Emax、Shell3Emax均增高。AE-max、Shell1Emax、Shell2Emax和Shell3Emax对诊断乳腺癌均有一定价值，曲线下面积分别为0.723、0.893、0.818和0.791。AE-max、Shell1Emax、Shell2Emax和Shell3Emax对诊断乳腺癌患者术后复发均有一定价值，曲线下面积分别为0.754、0.884、0.824和0.782。说明剪切波弹性成像定量分析对诊断乳腺癌和预测预后具有一定价值。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 剪切波弹性成像, 最大弹性模量值, 诊断

Abstract: This paper discusses the effect of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters on the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer.Sixty cases of breast cancer patients were taken as the observation group, and 60 cases of benign breast nodules were taken as the control group. The maximum elastic modulus (Emax) were collected for ultrasonic examination using shear wave elastography.T test was used to analyze the difference of Emax between the two groups, and ROC curve was used to analyze the value of Emax in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The results showed that compared with the control group, AE max, Shell1emax, shell2emax and Shell3emax in the observation group were increased. AE max, Shell1emax, Shell2emax and Shell3emax had certain value in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The area under the curve was 0.723, 0.893, 0.818 and 0.791, respectively. AE max, Shell1emax, Shell2emax and Shell3emax had certain value in the diagnosis of postoperative recurrence of breast cancer. The area under the curve was 0.754, 0.884, 0.824 and 0.782, respectively. It is concluded that the quantitative analysis of shear wave elastography has certain value in the diagnosis of breast cancer and prediction of prognosis.

Key words: breast cancer, shear wave elastography, maximum elastic modulus, diagnosis

陈艳, 彭国平, 闵洁, 林晶. 剪切波弹性成像定量参数对良恶性乳腺肿块的鉴别及对乳腺癌术后复发的预测价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(1): 24-28.

CHEN Yan, PENG Guoping, MIN Jie, LIN Jing. The Value of Shear Wave Elastography Quantitative Parameters in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and the Prediction of Post-operative Recurrence of Breast Cancer[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 39(1): 24-28.

参考文献

[1] Huang M H, Blackwood J, Godoshian M, et al. Factors associated with self-reported falls, balance or walking difficulty in older survivors of breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer:results from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare health outcomes survey linkage[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(12):e8573-e8578.
[2] Figueira P V G, Haddad C A S, De Almeida R S, et al. Diagnosis of axillary web syndrome in patients after breast cancer surgery:epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical aspects:a prospective study[J].American Journal of Clinical Oncology,2018,41(10):992-996.
[3] Fairweather M, Jiang W, Keating N L, et al. Morbidity of local therapy for locally advanced metastatic breast cancer:an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)-medicare registry[J]. Breast Cancer Research Treat,2018,169(2):287-293.
[4] Mailhot Vega R B, Balogun O D, Ishaq O F, et al. Estimating child mortality associated with maternal mortality from breast and cervical cancer[J]. Cancer,2019,125(1):109-117.
[5] Moller M H, Lousdal M L, Kristiansen I S, et al. Effect of organized mammography screening on breast cancer mortality:a population-based cohort study in Norway[J]. International Journal of Cancer, 2019,144(4):697-706.
[6] Zheng J, Tabung F K, Zhang J, et al. Association between post-cancer diagnosis dietary inflammatory potential and mortality among invasive breast cancer survivors in the women's health initiative[J]. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 2018,27(4):454-463.
[7] Badu-peprah A, Adu-sarkodie Y. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis, mammography and ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of breast cancer[J]. Ghana Medical Journal, 2018,52(3):133-139.
[8] Choi E J, Lee E H, Kim Y M, et al. Interobserver agreement in breast ultrasound categorization in the mammography and ultrasonography study for breast cancer screening effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial:results of a preliminary study[J]. Ultrasonography,2018,12(4):894-899.
[9] Jales R M, Doria M T, Serra K P, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonography and shear wave elastography as complementary imaging methods for suspected local breast cancer recurrence[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2018,37(6):1493-1501.
[10] 李菲. 三阴性乳腺癌常规超声及声触诊组织成像定量剪切波弹性成像特征[D].济南:山东大学,2018.
[11] Liu B, Zheng Y, Huang G, et al. Breast lesions:quantitative diagnosis using ultrasound shear wave elastography-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology,2016,42(4):835-847.
[12] Cong R, Li J, Guo S. A new qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastograghy for solid breast mass evaluation[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2017,87(21):111-119.
[13] Au F W, Ghai S, Moshonov H, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses:determination of the most discriminatory parameter[J].American Journal of Roentgenology, 2014,203(3):W328-336.
[14] Au F W, Ghai S, Lu F I, et al. Quantitative shear wave elastography:correlation with prognostic histologic features and immunohistochemical biomarkers of breast cancer[J]. Academic Radiology, 2015,22(3):269-277.
[15] Song E J, Sohn Y M, Seo M. Tumor stiffness measured by quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography of breast cancer[J]. The British Journal of Radiology, 2018,91(1086):20170830.
[16] Youk J H, Gweon H M, Son E J, et al. Shear-wave elastography of invasive breast cancer:correlation between quantitative mean elasticity value and immunohistochemical profile[J]. Breast Cancer Research Treat,2013,138(1):119-126.