影像科学与光化学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 510-514.DOI: 10.7517/issn.1674-0475.211204

• 综述与论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

SMART 3D-SMI在甲状腺TI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用

李朝喜, 温德惠, 刘伟亮, 陆海永   

  1. 河北北方学院附属第一医院, 河北张家口 075000
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-20 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-27

Application of SMART 3D-SMI in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant in TI-RADS 4 Thyroid Nodules

LI Chaoxi, WEN Dehui, LIU Weiliang, LU Haiyong   

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Heibei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, P. R. China
  • Received:2021-12-20 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-27

摘要: 探讨超微血管三维立体超声成像(SMART 3D-SMI)在甲状腺影像学报告及数据系统(TI-RADS)4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断。选取120例(128个结节)TI-RADS 4类结节患者,分析CDFI、2D-SMI、3D-SMI对TI-RADS 4类结节良恶性的诊断效能。病理确诊良性84个,恶性44个。TI-RADS 4a级87个,4b级30个,4c级11个,准确率为67.97%。与CDFI比,2D-SMI、3D-SMI的血流分级较高;与CDFI比,2D-SMI、3D-SMI检出3级血流较多;2D-SMI与3D-SMI的Adler分级比较,差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。良性结节在CDFI、2D-SMI、3D-SMI的血流分布模式差异无统计意义(P>0.05),与CDFI比,恶性结节在2D-SMI与3D-SMI模式下的Ⅲ型显示率较高(P<0.05)。TI-RADS分别联合CDFI、2D-SMI、3D-SMI鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性,三者比较,TI-RADS+3D-SMI的敏感性、准确度及阴性预测值更高(P<0.05),诊断特异度、阳性预测值差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。SMART 3D-SMI能准确评估甲状腺TI-RADS 4类结节的微血管空间分布和模式。

关键词: 甲状腺结节, 超微血管三维立体超声成像, 甲状腺影像学报告及数据系统, 鉴别诊断

Abstract: This study investigated the application value of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging (smart 3D-SMI) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant in TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules. 120 cases of patients (128 nodules) with TI-RADS type 4 nodules were selected and analyzed the diagnostic efficacy of CDFI, 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI for benign and malignant of TI-RADS type 4 nodules. Pathologically confirmed 84 cases benign and 44 cases malignant. TI-RADS had 87 grades 4a, 30 grades 4b and 11 grades 4c, with an accuracy rate of 67.97%. Compared with CDFI, 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI had higher blood flow grades, and detected more grade 3 blood flow. There was no statistically significant difference between 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI grades (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the blood flow distribution pattern of benign nodules in CDFI, 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI (P>0.05). Compared with CDFI, malignant nodules showed more type Ⅲ in 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI modes (P<0.05). TI-RADS combined with CDFI, 2D-SMI and 3D-SMI respectively in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, compared of the three methods, TI-RADS +3D-SMI had higher sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value (P<0.05), and had no significant difference in diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value (P<0.05). SMART 3D-SMI can accurately assess the microvascular spatial distribution and pattern of thyroid TI-RADS 4 nodules.

Key words: thyroid nodule, 3 dimensional ultrasound imaging of microvascular, thyroid imaging report and data system, differential diagnosis