三维经阴道超声对宫腔粘连患者宫腔容积及血流变化的评估

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.190921

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了观察宫腔粘连患者行三维经阴道超声（3D-TVS）检查时宫腔容积及血流的变化，本文纳入2016年11月~2018年11月于我院收治的68例宫腔粘连患者为观察组，另选取同期来我院体检的健康女性68例为对照组，均于月经周期中晚期行3D-TVS检查，并以病理诊断结果为金标准，观察了3D-TVS诊断宫腔粘连的灵敏度及特异度。同时，对比了两组患者3D-TVS参数如子宫内膜容积（EV）、血流指数（FI）、血管血流指数（VFI）及内膜区血管指数（VI）的变化，并分析了宫腔粘连不同分级患者上述3D-TVS参数的变化情况。经病理确诊的68例患者中，3D-TVS诊断为宫腔粘连64例，其中Ⅰ型21例，Ⅱ型31例，Ⅲ型9例，Ⅳ型3例。3D-TVS诊断宫腔粘连的灵敏度为92.65%，特异度为98.53%，准确率为95.59%，阳性预测值为98.44%，阴性预测值为93.06%，Kappa值为0.91。观察组EV、FI、VFI、VI均显著低于对照组。Ⅰ型宫腔粘连者EV显著大于Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ型者，Ⅱ型宫腔粘连者EV显著大于Ⅲ、Ⅳ型者，Ⅲ型宫腔粘连者EV显著大于Ⅳ型者；Ⅰ型宫腔粘连者的VFI、VI显著大于Ⅲ、Ⅳ型者。上述结果证实3D-TVS对宫腔粘连患者宫腔容积及血流变化具有重要的评估价值。

关键词: 经阴道三维超声, 宫腔粘连, 宫腔容积, 血流参数

Abstract: In this article, with three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS), the changes of uterine volume and blood flow in patients with intrauterine adhesions were observed. 68 cases of intrauterine adhesion from November 2016 to November 2018 were included as the observation group, and 68 healthy women who came to our hospital for physical examination during the same period were selected as the control group. All of them underwent 3D-TVS examination in the middle and late menstrual cycle, and the sensitivity and specificity were observed with the pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. At the same time, the changes of 3D-TVS parameters such as endometrial volume (EV), blood flow index (FI), blood flow index (VFI) and intimal vascular index (VI) in the two groups were compared, and the changes of the above parameters in patients with different levels of intrauterine adhesion were compared. Among 68 cases confirmed by pathology, 64 cases were diagnosed by 3D-TVS, including 21 cases of type Ⅰ, 31 cases of type Ⅱ, 9 cases of type Ⅲ and 3 cases of type Ⅳ. The sensitivity of 3D-TVS was 92.65%, the specificity was 98.53%, the accuracy was 95.59%, the positive predictive value was 98.44%, the negative predictive value was 93.06%, the kappa value was 0.91. The EV, FI, VFI and VI in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. EV in type Ⅰ was significantly higher than that in type Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ; EV in type Ⅱ was significantly higher than that in type Ⅲ and Ⅳ (P<0.05); EV in type Ⅲ was significantly higher than that in type Ⅳ; VFI and VI of type Ⅰ were significantly higher than those of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ. The above results confirmed that 3D-TVS had an important value in evaluating the changes of uterine volume and blood flow in patients with intrauterine adhesions.

Key words: transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound, intrauterine adhesion, intrauterine volume, blood flow parameters

刘莎, 陈娇, 陈文, 仇萌萌, 林叶. 三维经阴道超声对宫腔粘连患者宫腔容积及血流变化的评估[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(3): 436-440.

LIU Sha, CHEN Jiao, CHEN Wen, QIU Mengmeng, LIN Ye. Evaluation of Three-dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound in Uterine Volume and Blood Flow in Patients with Intrauterine Adhesions[J]. Imaging Science and Photochemistry, 2020, 38(3): 436-440.

参考文献

[1] 帅汝臻, 马钊, 刘丹. 宫腔粘连危险因素分析[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2017,39(5):461-463. Shuai R Z, Ma Z, Liu D. Analysis of risk factors of intraute-rine adhesions[J]. Ningxia Medical Journal, 2017,39(5):461-463.
[2] 段华, 甘露. 宫腔粘连诊治的现状与存在问题[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017,33(10):721-723. Duan H, Gan L. The current situation and problems of diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017,33(10):721-723.
[3] Amin T N, Saridogan E, Jurkovic D. Ultrasound and intrauterine adhesions:a novel structured approach to diagnosis and management[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015,46(2):131-139.
[4] 何玉梅, 宁荣萍, 陈红坚, 等. 经阴道三维超声诊断宫腔粘连的价值探讨[J]. 中国性科学, 2016,25(5):40-42. He Y M, Ning R P, Chen H J, et al. Value of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality, 2016,25(5):40-42.
[5] 中华医学会妇产科学分会. 宫腔粘连临床诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015,50(12):881-887. Obstetrics and Gynecology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Consensus of Chinese experts on clinical diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015,50(12):881-887.
[6] Ben S M D, Kees W M D, Sarstadt T, et al. Ultrasonic appearance of Asherman's syndrome in the third trimester of pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2010,17(8):602-606.
[7] 陈正云, 林俊. 影像学在宫腔粘连诊疗中的价值[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017,33(10):726-728. Chen Z Y, Lin J. The value of imaging in diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017,33(10):726-728.
[8] Amin T, Saridogan E, Dooley M, et al. Morphological appea-rance of uterine cavity on ultrasound prior to development of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018,51(1):142-143.
[9] Reid S, Nadim B, Bignardi T, et al. Association between three-dimensional transvaginal sonographic markers and outcome of pregnancy of unknown location:a pilot study[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016,48(5):650-655.
[10] 王希, 杨正春, 张晓航, 等. 经阴道三维超声在宫腔粘连中的诊断价值[J]. 重庆医学, 2017,46(35):4935-4937. Wang X, Yang Z C, Zhang X H, et al. Diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in intrauterine adhesions[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2017,46(35):4935-4937.
[11] 翟林, 张丹, 孟焱. 宫腔粘连宫腔形态的三维超声观察[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2017,33(2):157-159. Zhai L, Zhang D, Meng Y. Study on endometrial cavity shape by 3D ultrasonography in patients with intrauterine adhesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2017,33(2):157-159.
[12] 王海燕, 李北氢, 孙清涣, 等. 经阴道三维彩超在宫腔粘连筛查及治疗中的临床价值研究[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2018,27(3):213-217. Wang H Y, Li B Q, Sun Q H, et al. Clinical value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound for screening and treating intrauterine adhesion[J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2018,27(3):213-217.
[13] 刘鑫, 马黛群. 经阴道三维超声对宫腔粘连患者宫腔容积和血流变化的临床诊断价值研究[J]. 现代医学, 2018,46(3):259-263. Liu X, Ma D Q. Clinical diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound on uterine cavity volume and blood flow changes in patients with intrauterine adhesions[J]. Modern Medical Journal, 2018,46(3):259-263.
[14] Fu F, Duan H. Application of ultrasonography combined with hysteroscopy in the middle and lower segment of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2015,22(6):S190.
[15] Kim M J, Lee Y, Lee C, et al. Accuracy of three dimensional ultrasound and treatment outcomes of intrauterine adhesion in infertile women[J]. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015,54(6):737-741.