3.0T MRI对踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者损伤程度及治疗效果评价意义

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.210407

影像科学与光化学 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 865-870.DOI: 10.7517/issn.1674-0475.210407

3.0T MRI对踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者损伤程度及治疗效果评价意义

刘俊丽, 鲍鹏程

南通大学附属如皋医院如皋市人民医院放射科, 江苏如皋 226500

收稿日期:2021-04-13 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-11
通讯作者: 鲍鹏程

Evaluation of 3.0T MRI on the Degree of Injury and Therapeutic Effect of Patients with Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury

LIU Junli, BAO Pengcheng

Department of Radiology, Rugao Hospital/The People's Hospital of Rugao, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Rugao 226500, Jiangsu, P. R. China

Received:2021-04-13 Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取80例踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者作为研究对象，探讨3.0T磁共振成像（MRI）对损伤程度及治疗效果评价意义。踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者患侧距腓前韧带厚度高于健侧（P<0.05），患侧距腓前韧带厚度与损伤程度呈正相关关系（P<0.05）；损伤程度，病程，既往踝关节损伤，治疗后4周、8周、12周距腓前韧带厚度均为踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者疗效不良影响因素（P<0.05）；治疗后4周、8周、12周距腓前韧带厚度评估踝关节外侧韧带损伤的AUC值分别为0.760、0.823、0.869，治疗后12周AUC值最大。因此，3.0T MRI可清晰显示踝关节外侧韧带损伤后的病理性改变，准确评价损伤部位及程度，利于临床进行疗效评估，为选择最佳治疗手段提供精准影像学依据。

关键词: 3.0T磁共振成像, 踝关节外侧韧带损伤, 距腓前韧带, 疗效评价

Abstract: A total of 80 patients with lateral ligament injury of ankle joint were selected as the research object to explore the significance of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of injury degree and treatment effect. The thickness of the anterior talofibular ligament in the affected side was higher than that in the healthy side (P<0.05). The thickness of the anterior talofibular ligament in the affected side was positively correlated with the degree of injury (P<0.05). The degree of injury, course of disease, previous ankle injury, and the thickness of the anterior talofibular ligament at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment were all the influencing factors for the poor curative effect of patients with lateral ankle ligament injury (P<0.05). The AUC values of talofibular anterior ligament thickness were 0.760, 0.823 and 0.869 at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment, respectively. The AUC value was the highest at 12 weeks after treatment. Therefore, 3.0T MRI can clearly show the pathological changes after lateral ankle ligament injury, accurately evaluate the location and degree of injury, which is conducive to clinical efficacy evaluation, and provide accurate imaging basis for the selection of the best treatment method.

Key words: 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging, injury of the lateral ankle ligament, anterior talofibular ligament, efficacy evaluation

刘俊丽, 鲍鹏程. 3.0T MRI对踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者损伤程度及治疗效果评价意义[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(6): 865-870.

LIU Junli, BAO Pengcheng. Evaluation of 3.0T MRI on the Degree of Injury and Therapeutic Effect of Patients with Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 39(6): 865-870.

参考文献

[1] Thès A, Klouche S, Ferrand M, et al. Assessment of the feasibility of arthroscopic visualization of the lateral ligament of the ankle:a cadaveric study[J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24(4):985-990.
[2] 陶虹月, 胡忆文, 乔洋, 等. 伴有踝关节外侧副韧带损伤的慢性外侧踝关节不稳患者距骨软骨的T2-mapping评估[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(6):625-629.
[3] Jahjah A, Seidenspinner D, Schüttler K, et al. The effect of ankle tape on joint position sense after local muscle fatigue:a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2018, 19(1):8.
[4] 张弘毅, 郭长利, 尤浩, 等. 电针促进踝关节外侧副韧带损伤运动功能康复的临床研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2019, 34(4):1817-1821.
[5] 张程, 郑国涛, 曹希武, 等. 踝关节深层胫距后韧带的解剖学和MRI研究[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2019, 28(2):95-98.
[6] 方义杰, 李葳, 郭栓栓, 等. 业余马拉松运动员踝关节损伤的MRI特征及相关因素分析[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2019, 53(10):813-817.
[7] Akatsuka Y, Teramoto A, Takashima H, et al. Morphological evaluation of the calcaneofibular ligament in different ankle positions using a three-dimensional MRI sequence[J]. Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy, 2019, 41(3):307-311.
[8] 王志利, 徐丹凤, 吉幸双, 等. 3.0T MRI对腕骨间韧带损伤早期诊断的价值[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2018, 26(20):1893-1897.
[9] Canale S T, Beaty J H. 坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].11版. 王岩, 主译. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2008:1842-1863.
[10] 菲茨杰拉德. 骨科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006:127-129.
[11] 曾效力, 董相宇, 肖秀云, 等. 踝关节外侧副韧带损伤MRI诊断与疗效观察[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2017, 15(1):137-140.
[12] Wang C S, Tzeng Y H, Lin C C, et al. Radiographic evaluation of ankle joint stability after calcaneofibular ligament elevation during open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneus fracture[J]. Foot & Ankle International, 2016, 37(9):944-949.
[13] Persaud S, Hentges M J, Catanzariti A R. Occurrence of lateral ankle ligament disease with stage 2 to 3 adult-acquired flatfoot deformity confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging:a retrospective study[J]. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2019, 58(2):243-247.
[14] 杨德军, 韦骏, 孙嗣麒. MR薄层斜轴位质子加权脂肪抑制成像显示距腓前韧带的价值[J]. 海南医学, 2020, 31(1):75-78.
[15] 刘国彬, 张国平, 任庆云, 等. 踝关节不同姿势下MRI检查对其周围韧带及肌腱损伤的诊断价值:单中心、诊断性试验[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2017, 21(4):598-602.
[16] 庄志雄, 许新明, 曹欣荔, 等. 改良斜轴位磁共振成像扫描在距腓前韧带损伤中的应用价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(8):90-96.
[17] 梁智博, 尤壮志. X线片检查阴性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤的MRI分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(2):202-203.
[18] Walter W R, Hirschmann A, Alaia E F, et al. Journal club:MRI evaluation of midtarsal (Chopart) sprain in the setting of acute ankle injury[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2018, 210(2):386-95.
[19] 陈静, 邹月芬, 冯阳, 等. 单侧髋3.0T MRI在髋关节撞击综合征患者中的应用价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(1):54-57.
[20] 钱占华, 刘悦, 白荣杰, 等. 踝关节外侧韧带解剖及损伤的磁共振表现[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(29):2271-2274.
[21] 吴关, 王雪松, 张晋. 陈旧性距腓前韧带损伤诊断:MRI与应力像X线片的对比研究[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2018, 37(2):110-114.

3.0T MRI对踝关节外侧韧带损伤患者损伤程度及治疗效果评价意义

Evaluation of 3.0T MRI on the Degree of Injury and Therapeutic Effect of Patients with Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价