影像科学与光化学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 248-252.DOI: 10.7517/issn.1674-0475.210903

• 综述与论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

CDFI参数及超声评分诊断宫腔粘连的研究

曾小芬1, 李娜2, 彭微玲1   

  1. 1. 海口市琼山区妇幼保健院功能科, 海南 海口 571100;
    2. 海口市人民医院超声科, 海南 海口 570208
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-03-08
  • 通讯作者: 李娜

Study of CDFI Parameters and Ultrasound Scores in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions

ZENG Xiaofen1, LI Na2, PENG Weiling1   

  1. 1. Department of Functional, Qiongshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Haikou, Haikou 571100, Hainan, P. R. China;
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Haikou People's Hospital, Haikou 570208, Hainan, P. R. China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-03-08

摘要: 本研究探讨彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)、超声评分在诊断宫腔粘连中的应用价值。选取经宫腔镜检查确诊为宫腔粘连的患者120例作为粘连组,120例无宫腔粘连的妇女作为对照组,两组均接受二维超声、CDFI检查。结果显示:粘连组的子宫动脉博动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)、血管指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)测定值均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);粘连组的超声评分显著高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);重度粘连组的PI、RI、VI、FI测定值均显著低于轻度和中度组(P<0.05);重度粘连组的超声评分显著高于轻度和中度组(P<0.05);中度粘连组的PI、VI、FI测定值均显著低于轻度组(P<0.05);中度粘连组的超声评分显著高于轻度组(P<0.05);PI、RI、VI、FI、超声评分诊断宫腔粘连的AUC值分别为0.684、0.634、0.814、0.671、0.905,五项联合诊断的AUC为0.939。CDFI、超声评分在临床上诊断宫腔粘连具有方便、无创的优势,尤其利用超声评分诊断具有较高的价值。

关键词: 彩色多普勒超声参数, 超声评分, 宫腔粘连

Abstract: This study explored the value of color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and ultrasound scoring in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions. A total of 120 patients with intrauterine adhesions confirmed by hysteroscopy were selected as the adhesion group, and 120 women without intrauterine adhesions were selected as the control group. Both groups received two-dimensional ultrasound and CDFI. The measured values of uterine artery pulsation index (PI), resistance index (RI), vascular index (VI), and blood flow index (FI) in the adhesion group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The ultrasound score of the adhesion group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). The measured values of PI, RI, VI, and FI of the severe adhesion group were lower than those of the mild and moderate groups (P<0.05). The ultrasound score of the severe adhesion group was higher than the mild and moderate groups (P<0.05). The PI, VI, and FI values of the moderate adhesion group were lower than those of the mild group (P<0.05). The ultrasound score of the moderate adhesion group was higher than that of the mild group (P<0.05). The AUC values of PI, RI, VI, FI, and ultrasound scores for the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions were 0.684, 0.634, 0.814, 0.671, 0.905, respectively. The AUC of the five combined diagnoses was 0.939. CDFI and ultrasound scores have the advantages of convenience and non-invasiveness in clinical diagnosis of 248 intrauterine adhesions, especially the use of ultrasound scores for diagnosis has high value.

Key words: color Doppler parameters, ultrasound score, intrauterine adhesions