GDM孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉超声参数、血清FFA及PL在FGR诊断中的应用

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.220141

影像科学与光化学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 986-990.DOI: 10.7517/issn.1674-0475.220141

GDM孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉超声参数、血清FFA及PL在FGR诊断中的应用

范丽敏¹, 张雪葳¹, 刘培林², 周辉³

1. 濮阳医学高等专科学校, 河南濮阳 457000;
2. 濮阳市人民医院创伤骨科, 河南濮阳 457005;
3. 濮阳市人民医院妇产科, 河南濮阳 457005

收稿日期:2022-01-19 发布日期:2022-07-09
通讯作者: 范丽敏

Application of Ultrasonic Parameters of Fetal Umbilical Artery, Serum FFA and PL in the Diagnosis of FGR in GDM Pregnant Women in Late Pregnancy

FAN Limin¹, ZHANG Xuewei¹, LIU Peilin², ZHOU Hui³

1. Puyang Medical College, Puyang 457000, Henan, P. R. China;
2. Traumatic Osteopathic, Puyang Peaple's Hospital, Puyang 457005, Henan, P. R. China;
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Puyang People's Hospital, Puyang 457005, Henan, P. R. China

Received:2022-01-19 Published:2022-07-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究探讨妊娠糖尿病（GDM）孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉（UA）彩超指标、血清游离脂肪酸（FFA）、磷脂（PL）与胎儿生长受限（FGR）的关系。选取确诊的113例GDM且伴有FGR孕妇作为FGR组，另外选取同期妊娠的120例GDM孕妇作为对照组；彩色多普勒超声检测两组胎儿UA的血流参数，并检测血清FFA、PL水平，受试者操作特征（ROC）曲线分析各项参数诊断GDM孕妇FGR的价值。FGR组的血清FFA、PL水平均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；血清FFA、PL水平诊断FGR的AUC值分别为0.842、0.738；FGR组胎儿脐动脉S/D、PI、RI值均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；脐动脉S/D、PI、RI诊断FGR的AUC值分别为0.827、0.719、0.757；FGR组的血清FFA、PL与S/D值、PI、RI呈正相关（P<0.05）。GDM伴FGR胎儿UA的血流参数发生明显改变，孕妇血清的FFA、PL水平增高，孕晚期检测上述指标对于评估FGR有一定的价值，同时S/D值、PI、RI与新生儿出生时缺氧有关。

关键词: 妊娠糖尿病, 孕晚期, 脐动脉, 胎儿生长受限, 游离脂肪酸, 磷脂

Abstract: This study investigated the relationship between fetal umbilical artery (UA) color Doppler ultrasound, serum free fatty acids (FFA), phospholipids (PL) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in late pregnancy. 113 pregnant women with GDM who were diagnosed with FGR were selected as the FGR group, and the other 120 pregnant women with GDM who were pregnant during the same period were selected as the control group. Color Doppler ultrasonography was used to detect the blood flow parameters of the fetuses UA in the two groups, and the serum levels of FFA and PL. The receiver operating curve analyzed the value of various parameters in the diagnosis of FGR in pregnant women with GDM. The levels of serum FFA and PL in FGR group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The AUC values of serum FFA and PL levels in the diagnosis of FGR were 0.842 and 0.738, respectively. The S/D, PI and RI of fetal umbilical artery in FGR group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The AUC values of umbilical artery S/D, PI, and RI in the diagnosis of FGR were 0.827, 0.719, and 0.757, respectively. Serum FFA, PL in FGR group were positively correlated with S/D, PI and RI (P<0.05). The blood flow parameters of the fetus UA with GDM and FGR changed significantly, and the serum FFA and PL levels of pregnant women increased. The detection of the above indicators in the late pregnancy has a certain value for evaluating FGR. At the same time, S/D value, PI and RI are related to hypoxia at birth.

Key words: gestational diabetes mellitus, late pregnancy, umbilical artery, fetal growth restriction, free fatty acid, phospholipid

范丽敏, 张雪葳, 刘培林, 周辉. GDM孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉超声参数、血清FFA及PL在FGR诊断中的应用[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(4): 986-990.

FAN Limin, ZHANG Xuewei, LIU Peilin, ZHOU Hui. Application of Ultrasonic Parameters of Fetal Umbilical Artery, Serum FFA and PL in the Diagnosis of FGR in GDM Pregnant Women in Late Pregnancy[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 986-990.

参考文献

[1] 柯晓琼, 夏小文, 张祖艳, 等. 妊娠中、晚期筛查HbA1c预测妊娠期糖尿病及妊娠结局[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020,28(2):277-279, 283.
[2] 张淳义, 倪颖华, 季鑫, 等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白和糖化白蛋白水平与新生儿体重的相关性[J]. 检验医学, 2017,32(3):165-168.
[3] Brand J S, West J, Tuffnell D, et al. Gestational diabetes and ultrasound-assessed fetal growth in South Asian and White European women:Findings from a prospective pregnancy cohort[J]. BMC Medicine, 2018,16(1):203.
[4] 吴寿荣, 黄和明, 马炜锋. HhAlc、GSP、SHBG、TG、FFA对妊娠期糖尿病的诊断价值研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2018,39(6):678-680.
[5] 刘环宇, 冉若曦, 刘松梅, 等. 血清游离脂肪酸与妊娠期糖尿病合并早期肾功能损伤相关性的研究[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2020,28(6):410-414.
[6] 冯卫红, 郭娜, 米阳, 等. 妊娠期糖尿病合并胎儿生长受限孕妇血清FFA、PL表达及与胎盘滋养细胞关系[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020,28(12):1999-2003, 2137.
[7] 中华医学会围产医学分会胎儿医学学组, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 胎儿生长受限专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2019,22(6):361-380.
[8] 金春霞, 金凯. 孕期脂代谢异常与母儿不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2019,30(6):714-717.
[9] 楼公先, 楼时先, 程秒鸳, 等. 孕早期FBG、HbAlc、TC、TG联合检测在妊娠期糖尿病诊断中的应用价值分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019,17(5):809-812.
[10] 韩云, 陈丽平, 郑艳莉, 等. 内质网应激介导的胎盘滋养细胞凋亡在妊娠期糖尿病合并胎儿生长受限中的研究[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2018,19(5):445-446.
[11] 母仕银, 张珂, 邱丽倩. 胎儿生长受限监测的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2021,33(4):369-372, 376.
[12] Marton M, Kurucz A, Lizak B, et al. A systems biological view of life-and-death decision with respect to endoplasmic reticulum stressthe role of PERK pathway[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2017,18(1):58.
[13] 王艳丽, 杨亚培, 宋欢欢. PAPP-A与子宫动脉多普勒在早发型子痫前期和胎儿生长受限预测中的价值[J]. 广东医学, 2021,42(5):582-585.
[14] 郑明明, 胡娅莉. 胎儿生长受限的筛查[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020,36(8):692-695.
[15] 李娟, 张颖, 翟莉丽, 等. 四维能量多普勒超声对胎儿生长受限的早孕期预测价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2021,18(16):137-141.
[16] 马楠, 陈静, 李媛媛. 彩色多普勒血流参数对胎儿生长受限的诊断价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021,39(4):556-559.
[17] 刘丽. 胎儿生长受限孕妇胎盘血流状态指标的变化及临床意义[J]. 山东医药, 2021,61(13):81-83.
[18] 谭虎, 陈敦金. 胎儿生长受限临床诊断[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020,36(8):695-698.

GDM孕妇孕晚期胎儿脐动脉超声参数、血清FFA及PL在FGR诊断中的应用

Application of Ultrasonic Parameters of Fetal Umbilical Artery, Serum FFA and PL in the Diagnosis of FGR in GDM Pregnant Women in Late Pregnancy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	路炜, 牛占杰, 孟腾腾, 单倩倩. 多普勒超声联合血清FE3、ACTA预测孕妇羊水过少并胎儿窘迫[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(1): 38-42.
[2]	梁艳玲, 汪劲松, 何嘉辉, 刘德永. 超高频纯净波超声测量孕晚期胎儿第三脑室在产前筛查中的应用[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(6): 879-882.
[3]	刘小婧, 吴红霞, 祝立卷. 超声脐动脉S/D值联合胎心率监测对新生儿窒息的临床诊断分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(5): 711-715.
[4]	马楠, 陈静, 李媛媛. 彩色多普勒血流参数对胎儿生长受限的诊断价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(4): 556-559.
[5]	仇萌萌, 李功璐. 彩超参数MCA、UA联合胎心监护预测胎儿宫内缺氧的模型分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(4): 621-625.
[6]	任秀娥, 王卓, 郑晓芳, 尹志辉, 贾亚男. 高危妊娠晚期胎儿脐动脉、大脑中动脉血流多普勒参数变化与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(3): 447-452.
[7]	王卓, 任秀娥, 郑莉霞. 彩色多普勒超声测量胎儿脐动脉、大脑中动脉和主动脉弓峡部血流参数诊断孕晚期胎儿生长受限[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(2): 236-241.
[8]	黄雁, 徐兰琴. 光亲和标记磷脂酸类似物的合成[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2003, 21(3): 195-199.