The Predictive Value of Clinical and Ultrasound Indicators for Intraoperative Bleeding Volume in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.230926

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the risk factors affecting intraoperative bleeding volume in cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after cesarean section, and to search for clinical and ultrasound indicators that can predict intraoperative bleeding volume in CSP. A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical and ultrasound data of 133 patients with CSP, and the patients were divided into group A (bleeding volume<100 mL) and group B (bleeding volume ≥ 100 mL) based on whether the intraoperative bleeding volume was more than 100 mL. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors related to intraoperative bleeding volume in patients. Logistic regression model screened the maximum diameter of gestational sac and the residual myometrial thickness as independent risk factors for predicting intraoperative bleeding volume, with cutoff values of 32.5 mm and 2.45 mm, respectively. In this study, we concluded that residual myometrial thickness and the maximum diameter of gestational sac are independent risk factors for predicting intraoperative bleeding volume during CSP.

Key words: ultrasonography, cesarean scar pregnancy, intraoperative bleeding volume, risk factors

ZHANG Jieying, WAN Hui, LIU Yingying, LU Yue, DU Jianwen. The Predictive Value of Clinical and Ultrasound Indicators for Intraoperative Bleeding Volume in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 41(6): 358-363.

References

[1] 金力, 陈蔚琳, 周应芳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2017, 15(1):5-9.
[2] 李冬冬, 荆秀娟, 杨岚, 等. "跨越征分型"指导剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠手术方式的研究(2022)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(2):133-138.
[3] 钱志大. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠相关临床问题及发生机制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015.
[4] Timor-Tritsch I E, Monteagudo A, Calì G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy:Diagnosis and pathogenesis[J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2019, 46(4):797-811.
[5] 程琳. 胚期胎盘位置的超声判定及其对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床价值探讨[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2016.
[6] 肖汀, 黄伟俊, 张四友, 等. 经阴道超声与超声造影联合临床因素评估剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠治疗方式的研究(2022)[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(3):231-235.
[7] Wang Y, Tan G C, Cheng X H, et al. Association of hemorrhage at termination in Caesarean scar pregnancy using the crossover sign of ultrasound image[J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2020, 46(8):1378-1383.
[8] 李康宁. 超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术前诊断、风险评估及远期随访中的临床应用研究[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院, 2016.
[9] 李康宁, 戴晴, 刘真真, 等. 超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠大出血风险评估中的应用价值[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2015, 37(5):585-590.
[10] Wang Q, Ma H, Peng H, et al. Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy:A case-control study[J]. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 2015, 195:141-145.
[11] Zhang X L, Pang Y X, Ma Y H, et al. A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(43):e22845.
[12] Zhang Y, Zhang Z Y, Liu X Y, et al. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303(2):321-328.
[13] Jordans I P M, Verberkt C, De Leeuw R A, et al. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation:Modified Delphi method[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology:the Official Journal of the Internation Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 59(4):437-449.
[14] Kaelin Agten A, Cali G, Monteagudo A, et al. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted "on the scar" versus "in the niche"[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 216(5):510.e1-510.e6.

[1]	LI Long, ZHANG Suya, LV Bin, WANG Beibei, LENG Zhiyuan. Study on the Influence of Thyroid Nodule Size on the Quality of Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy Specimens [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 42(1): 29-33.
[2]	LIU Yingying, ZHANG Jieying, WAN Hui, DU Jianwen. Research Progress of Ultrasound in Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 41(1): 1-5.
[3]	GONG Wenliang, ZHOU Jian, ZHU Daowei. Evaluation of Resectability of Breast Cancer Lesions by Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Shear Wave Elastography [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(6): 1375-1380.
[4]	JIAO Yue, YAO Shuiping, GUO Li, GUO Chunlei. Application of MRI Combined with Serum AFP in the Diagnosis of CSP and Placenta Accrete [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(6): 1381-1385.
[5]	DU Jianqing, WANG Li, WU Zhongyin, LI Ronghua, ZHANG Hong. Correlation Analysis between RI and VCSS Score in Patients with Great Saphenous Varicose Veins Complicated with Deep Femoral Popliteal Venous Reflux [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(5): 1067-1071.
[6]	CHEN Yu, ZHANG Chunye, WANG Weijing, GENG Xuna, SUN Congxin, ZHAO Wei, WANG Pin. Diagnostic Analysis of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Diseases in Different Stages of Pregnancies by Three-dimensional Ultrasonography [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(5): 1148-1152.
[7]	MU Leixia, WANG Lei, SUN Junjun, GAO Yaping. Application of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of the Nature of Gastric Diseases [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 730-734.
[8]	TANG Yunjun, ZHANG Hailin, YANG Shengjie. The Value of CCTA in Diagnosing Left Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions and Its Risk Factors [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 735-740.
[9]	LI Mei, ZHENG Suili, LIU Chu, HUANG Yuechun. Study on CEUS Characteristics and Parameter Changes in Patients with Thyroid Cancer [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 773-777.
[10]	FU Min, LI Qiumei, ZHANG Fan, JIA Li, ZHENG Hongyan. Study of the Structural Parameters of Bladder after Pelvic Floor Reconstruction by Ultrasound [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 859-862.
[11]	ZHANG Hongqiang, LI Rushen, WU Mingmin, SU Yuandong. Analysis of Intracranial Infection Factors and Diagnostic Value of CT and MRI in Patients after Craniocerebral Surgery [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(4): 917-921.
[12]	LI Qi, WANG Jun, MEI Chunxiu. The Correlation and Significance of MRI Parameters, β-HCG and Retreatment after Evacuation of Scar Pregnancy [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(1): 64-68.
[13]	GUAN Yiman, LIU Yaning, ZHANG Chai, LI Dexin, CHANG Yali. The Value of TVS and CEUS in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Endometrial Lesions [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(1): 69-72.
[14]	YU Chan, WANG Bei, YANG Yuan, DI Min. Value and Risk Factors of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 40(1): 156-160.
[15]	LI Yanfang, CHEN Wei, ZHOU Xiaoxiang, WANG Xuejiao, BAO Qing. Risk Factors of Aspiration after Stroke and Evaluation of Swallowing Function by VFSS [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 39(6): 892-895.