腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性分析

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.230714

影像科学与光化学 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 314-319.DOI: 10.7517/issn.1674-0475.230714

腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性分析

袁艳¹, 胡萍香¹, 林燕秋², 丘远婵³, 曾卫姗⁴, 吴姗¹

1. 深圳市中医院超声影像科, 广东深圳 518001;
2. 深圳市罗湖区人民医院超声影像科, 广东深圳 518001;
3. 深圳市中医院妇产科, 广东深圳 518043;
4. 深圳市中医院放射影像科, 广东深圳 518043

收稿日期:2023-07-28 出版日期:2023-11-23 发布日期:2023-12-14
通讯作者: 胡萍香

Diagnostic Sensitivity Analysis of Abdominal Ultrasound Combined with DCE-MRI in Ovarian Tumor-like Lesions

YUAN Yan¹, HU Pingxiang¹, LIN Yanqiu², QIU Yuanchan³, ZENG Weishan⁴, WU Shan¹

1. Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen 518001, Guangdong, P. R. China;
2. Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518001, Guangdong, P. R. China;
3. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen 518043, Guangdong, P. R. China;
4. Department of Radiology and Imaging, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen 518043, Guangdong, P. R. China

Received:2023-07-28 Online:2023-11-23 Published:2023-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究分析腹部超声联合动态对比增强磁共振成像（DCE-MRI）在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性，以临床疑似卵巢瘤样病变患者为研究对象，所有患者术前均行腹部超声联合DCE-MRI检查，以术后病理结果为"金标准"，探究腹部超声联合DCE-MRI的阳性与阴性检出结果，对比腹部超声联合DCE-MRI的诊断效能（特异度、敏感度），同时比较腹部超声联合DCE-MRI检查的阻力指数（RI），使用配套软件自动计算容量转移常数（Ktrans）、速率常数（Kep）及血管外细胞外间隙容积比（Ve），作受试者操作特征（ROC）曲线分析模型诊断价值。结果发现，腹部超声联合DCE-MRI诊断的敏感度（96.77%）、特异度（98.55%）均高于单一腹部超声及DCE-MRI诊断结果（P<0.05）；卵巢瘤样病变组RI指数高于卵巢肿瘤组，Ktrans、Kep、Ve水平低于卵巢肿瘤组（P<0.05）；绘制ROC曲线预测模型最佳临界值为0.088，提示腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断综合价值高。

关键词: 腹部超声, 增强磁共振成像, 卵巢瘤样病变, 灵敏性

Abstract: Studying the diagnostic sensitivity of abdominal ultrasound combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in ovarian tumor-like lesions. In patients with clinically suspected ovarian tumor-like lesions. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasound DOS combined with DCE-MRI, with the postoperative pathological results as the "gold standard". To explore the positive and negative findings of abdominal ultrasound combined with DCE-MRI. Compare the diagnostic efficacy of abdominal ultrasound combined with DCE-MRI (specificity, sensitivity). Also compare the resistance index (RI) of abdominal ultrasound combined with DCE-MRI examination. Automatic calculation of volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep) and the vascular extracellular space volume ratio (Ve) using matching software. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis model diagnostic value. The results found that the sensitivity of abdominal ultrasound combined with DCE-MRI (96.77%) and specificity (98.55%) were higher than those of single abdominal ultrasound and DCE-MRI (P<0.05). The RI index of ovarian tumor group was higher than that of ovarian tumor group, and Ktrans, Kep and Ve levels were lower than that of ovarian tumor group (P<0.05). The optimal cut-off value of drawing ROC curve prediction model was 0.088, suggesting that the diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound combined with DCE-MRI in ovarian tumor lesions was high.

Key words: abdominal ultrasound, DCE-MRI, ovarian tumor lesions, sensitivity

袁艳, 胡萍香, 林燕秋, 丘远婵, 曾卫姗, 吴姗. 腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2023, 41(6): 314-319.

YUAN Yan, HU Pingxiang, LIN Yanqiu, QIU Yuanchan, ZENG Weishan, WU Shan. Diagnostic Sensitivity Analysis of Abdominal Ultrasound Combined with DCE-MRI in Ovarian Tumor-like Lesions[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 41(6): 314-319.

参考文献

[1] 孟改玲, 田素英. 腹部超声联合阴道超声诊断卵巢瘤样病变的价值研究[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2019, 26(4):422-424.
[2] 韩虹, 吴慧. 经腹部超声联合经阴道超声诊断卵巢瘤样病变的临床价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(4):940-942.
[3] 黄冬冬. 腹部超声联合阴道超声诊断卵巢瘤样病变的价值研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2017, 14(4):57-60.
[4] Kang Y N, Flores L, Ngai H W, et al. Large, anionic liposomes enable targeted intraperitoneal delivery of a TLR 7/8 agonist to repolarize ovarian tumors' microenvironment[J]. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2021, 32(8):1581-1592.
[5] Kenda Suster N, Smrkolj S, Virant-Klun I. Putative stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition revealed in sections of ovarian tumor in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma using immunohistochemistry for vimentin and pluripotency-related markers[J]. Journal of Ovarian Research, 2017, 10(1):1-15.
[6] 任鸿萍, 洪莲, 张毅辉,等. 1.5T MRI弥散加权成像联合CT对女性盆腔肿瘤良恶性的诊断价值分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(3):525-529.
[7] 刘志浩, 贾镕泽, 曹长勇, 等. 儿童和青少年卵巢肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的临床及影像特征[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2019, 17(2):147-150.
[8] Mani C, Tripathi K, Chaudhary S, et al. Hedgehog/GLI1 transcriptionally regulates FANCD2 in ovarian tumor cells:its inhibition induces HR-deficiency and synergistic lethality with PARP inhibition[J]. Neoplasia, 2021, 23(9):1002-1015.
[9] 秦玉芳. 探讨经腹部超声联合经阴道超声诊断卵巢瘤样病变的临床价值[J]. 中国保健营养, 2021, 31(34):940-942.
[10] 李国芳. 增强CT、超声联合检测对术前鉴别卵巢病变良恶性的价值及影像特点分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2019, 17(3):109-112.
[11] 王昌干, 陈彬冰. 腹部超声联合阴道超声诊断卵巢瘤样病变的价值分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2023, 32(2):350-352.
[12] 吴招兰, 陈雪梅, 罗月华. 腹部超声联合阴道超声检查在卵巢瘤样病变诊断中的价值分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2022, 33(23):3549-3551.
[13] 王维平, 张乐, 李金星, 等. 常规MRI及DCE-MRI在卵巢肿瘤及肿瘤样病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2020, 26(1):39-44.
[14] Pinschke M, Gnann D, Smekal I, et al. OP24.02:Asymptomatic adnexal masses:Accuracy of characterization with ultrasound scoring systems, color Doppler sonography, 3D-ultrasound, and MR imaging[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, 34(S1):139.
[15] 张恒君. 经腹部超声和CT对卵巢瘤样病变定性、定量诊断的准确率分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2022, 20(10):115-117.
[16] 杨璐璐. 经腹及经阴道彩色超声诊断卵巢肿瘤的临床价值[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2020,26(22):147-148.
[17] 鲁龙龙, 王栋, 连鹏, 等. MRI及DCE-MRI在卵巢肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的诊断价值[J]. 河北医学, 2021, 27(11):1821-1826.
[18] 张璐芳, 蔡晶, 王泽华. VEGF及基质金属蛋白酶与卵巢癌临床分期的相关性分析[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2019, 47(1):30-32.
[19] 沈建华, 王升平, 杨晓金, 等. 常规MRI联合DCE-MRI在卵巢肿瘤及肿瘤样病变中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2022, 28(9):74-76.
[20] 刘景雁, 王晶晶, 吴青青. 超声监测≤ 55岁乳腺癌术后患者子宫内膜及卵巢病变的临床价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2022, 24(9):706-709.

腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性分析

Diagnostic Sensitivity Analysis of Abdominal Ultrasound Combined with DCE-MRI in Ovarian Tumor-like Lesions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨巧飞, 杨普, 毕孝杨, 李正亮, 杨璐帆, 唐艳隆. 基于MRI列线图模型对乳腺良恶性结节的预测价值研究[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2023, 41(6): 338-344.
[2]	张倩倩, 李岩, 任虹, 肖爱伟, 刘珊珊, 于桂泳. DE-ICER在无先兆偏头痛平衡针刺后血脑屏障改变中的评估作用及与镇痛效果的关系[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2023, 41(1): 11-16.
[3]	郑奕, 江迎春, 杨豪, 董战军, 陈艳, 李思强. 药物治疗前后RA患者DCE-MRI参数变化及对骨侵蚀情况的影响[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2023, 41(1): 136-141.
[4]	杨俊忠, 胡浩, 李佳宾, 李亮, 黄攀. DCE-MRI参数对股骨颈骨折患者术后股骨头坏死的评估[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(5): 1143-1147.
[5]	封捷, 李梦双, 段新秀. DCE-MRI对上皮性卵巢癌的诊断价值及与微血管密度的关系[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(4): 832-836.
[6]	杜志坡, 马淑芳, 李警, 王建波, 张朝, 崔坤坤. DCE-MRI参数联合IFIT1基因对腰椎间盘突出患者椎间盘退变程度的评估价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(1): 11-16.
[7]	陈月, 沈俊杰. 增强CT与增强磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌病灶的对比研究[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(6): 831-835.
[8]	郑婧, 任水明, 张凤翔, 高倩, 高婧, 杨永梅, 高凯乐. DCE-MRI检查五项参数与类风湿关节炎疾病活动度关系及临床价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(5): 721-726.
[9]	史凌波, 李军. 动态增强磁共振成像与16层螺旋CT对小肾癌诊断及术前评估的价值对比[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(2): 310-314.
[10]	胡起立, 宋黎涛, 黄松. 3.0T动态增强MRI联合fPSA/tPSA检测对前列腺癌的诊断效能[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(5): 871-875.
[11]	石辛景, 康志平, 刘亚静, 邢龙颜, 杨冬雪, 陈莉茹. 经阴道超声和经腹部超声测量瘢痕妊娠的瘢痕厚度与实际厚度的相关性分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(1): 101-108.