新型非对比剂增强MR血管成像技术用于肝门静脉成像的可行性研究

doi:10.7517/issn.1674-0475.231013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究探讨了非对比剂非触发增强磁共振血管成像技术(REACT)用于肝门静脉成像的可行性。前瞻性研究22名健康志愿者分别行上腹部平衡式梯度回波序列(BTFE)和REACT序列扫描,比较两组序列图像整体显示质量评分,以及肝门静脉主干、左支、右支的最小与最大信号强度比值(RSI)、信噪比(SNR)以及对比信噪比(CNR),采用配对t检验或配对秩和检验分析RSI、SNR及CNR在两组间差异,采用Kappa检验评估图像质量评分的一致性。结果显示REACT组肝门静脉整体图像质量平均评分(3.86)略高于BTFE组(3.2),两组间差异具有统计学意义(Z=－4.6,P<0.05);BTFE组肝门静脉的RSI数值(0.81)略高于REACT组(0.76),REACT组肝门静脉主干、左右支的SNR、CNR显著高于BTFE组,两组间差异均具有统计学意义(Z值－4.57～－3.82,P值均<0.05)。因此,REACT序列的图像质量要优于BTFE序列,同时运用水脂分离技术(Dixon)抑脂的REACT序列得到的背景信号更加干净,门静脉血管成像显示也更为清晰。

关键词: 肝门静脉血管成像, 非对比剂增强磁共振血管成像, 平衡式梯度回波序列, 非对比剂非触发增强磁共振血管成像, 磁共振成像

Abstract: This study explored the feasibility of using relaxation-enhanced MR angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) for imaging the hepatic portal vein, and to explore. Prospective study of 22 healthy volunteers who underwent upper abdominal imaging with balance turbo field echo (BTFE) and REACT sequences. The overall image quality score, the ratio of minimum to maximum signal intensity (RSI), signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the main hepatic portal vein, right portal vein and left portal vein were compared between the BTFE group and the REACT group. Paired t-test or paired rank sum test was used to analyze the differences in RSI, SNR, and CNR between the two groups, and Kappa test was used 16to evaluate the consistency of image quality scores. The results showed the average score of overall image quality of hepatic portal vein in REACT group (3.86) was slightly higher than that in BTFE group (3.2), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=－4.6, P<0.05). The RSI of hepatic portal vein in BTFE group (0.81) was slightly higher than that in REACT group (0.76). The SNR and CNR of hepatic portal vein trunk, left and right branches in REACT group were significantly higher than those in BTFE group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (Z value －4.57-－3.82, P<0.05). Therefore, the image quality of REACT sequence is a little better than that of BTFE sequence in non-contrast enhanced portal vein angiography. In addition, the use of water-fat separation technology (Dixon) to suppress fat in the REACT sequence can obtain a cleaner background signal, and the imaging display of hepatic portal vein is clearer.

Key words: hepatic portal vein angiography, non-contrast enhancement magnetic resonance angiography, balance turbo field echo, relaxation-enhanced MR angiography without contrast and triggering, magnetic resonance imaging

钟志明, 潘慧, 班统幸, 刘然申, 陈鹏, 蒋洁瑛. 新型非对比剂增强MR血管成像技术用于肝门静脉成像的可行性研究[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2024, 42(1): 16-22.

ZHONG Zhiming, PAN Hui, BAN Tongxing, LIU Ranshen, CHEN Peng, JIANG Jieying. Feasibility of A Novel Non-contrast Enhanced MR Angiography for Hepatic Portal Vein Imaging[J]. IMAGING SCIENCE AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 42(1): 16-22.

参考文献

[1] 汤浩,王秋霞,孟晓岩,等.非对比剂增强MR血管成像技术在门静脉成像中的应用[J].放射学实践, 2014, 29(12):1434-1438.
[2] Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, et al. Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography-implications for surgery[J]. RadioGraphics, 2004, 24(5):1367-1380.
[3] 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,中华医学会器官移植学分会肝移植学组.中国肝癌肝移植临床实践指南(2021版)[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(4):433-443.
[4] 赵龙,李国奇,孟凡宇,等.非增强磁共振血管成像与超声检查对肾功能不全患者肾动脉狭窄程度诊断价值的对比研究[J].心肺血管病杂志, 2021, 40(3):265-269.
[5] Heilmaier C, Sutter R, Lutz A M, et al. Mapping of hepatic vascular anatomy:Dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64-detector row CT[J]. Radiology, 2007, 245(3):872-880.
[6] McDonald R J, McDonald J S, Kallmes D F, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2015, 275(3):772-782.
[7] Lord M L, Chettle D R, Gräfe J L, et al. Observed deposition of gadolinium in bone using a new noninvasive in vivo biomedical device:Results of a small pilot feasibility study[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(1):96-103.
[8] Edelman R R, Koktzoglou I. Noncontrast MR angiography:An update[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2019, 49(2):355-373.
[9] 张贝贝,陈亮,刘宇佳,等. 3.0T MR NATIVE True-FISP与VIBE序列在肝脏门静脉成像中的对比研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2019, 30(6):413-415.
[10] 姚斐斐,杨子涛,高雪梅,等.平衡式稳态自由进动序列在非对比剂腹部血管成像方面的应用[J].中国医学影像技术, 2016, 32(2):318-322.
[11] Yoneyama M, Zhang S, Hu H H, et al. Free-breathing non-contrast-enhanced flow-independent MR angiography using magnetization-prepared 3D non-balanced dual-echo Dixon method:A feasibility study at 3 Tesla[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2019, 63(5):137-146.
[12] Pennig L, Kabbasch C, Hoyer U C I, et al. Relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) for fast imaging of extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke at 3T[J]. Clinical Neuroradiology, 2021, 31(3):815-826.
[13] 曹毛毛,陈万青.肝癌筛查研究进展[J].中国肿瘤, 2020, 29(12):925-932.
[14] 柳计强.流入反转恢复序列在肝移植血管成像中的应用研究[D].新乡:新乡医学院, 2019.
[15] Schoenberg S O, Rieger J, Weber C H, et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions:comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US[J]. Radiology, 2005, 235(2):687-698.
[16] Luke F E, Allen B C, Moshiri S T, et al. Multiphase multi-detector row computed tomography in the setting of chronic liver disease and orthotopic liver transplantation can a series be eliminated in order to reduce radiation dose[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2013, 37(3):408-414.
[17] Prince M R, Zhang H L, Morris M, et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis at two large medical centers[J]. Radiology, 2008, 248(3):807-816.
[18] 柳计强,张海三,李金平,等.流入反转恢复序列在肝移植术后MR门静脉成像中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(3):412-415.
[19] Ayako O, Shigeki A, Koji F, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography within a breath-hold using compressed sensing acceleration:A prospective noninferiority study[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017, 43(3):42-47.
[20] 董海洋,孙炎冰,朱莉,等.时间-空间标记反转脉冲非增强肝门静脉TRANCE与bFFE成像对比研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2020, 26(2):130-134.
[21] Tan E J, Zhang S, Tirukonda P, et al. REACT-A novel flow-independent non-gated non-contrast MR angiography technique using magnetization-prepared 3D non-balanced dual-echo Dixon method:Preliminary clinical experience[J]. European Journal of Radiology Open, 2020, 7(3):44-53.
[22] Pennig L, Wagner A, Weiss K, et al. Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta[J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, 37(1):315-329.
[23] Pennig L, Wagner A, Weiss K, et al. Imaging of the pulmonary vasculature in congenital heart disease without gadolinium contrast Intraindividual comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified REACT with 4D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance:Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2020, 22(1):8-17.
[24] Isaak A, Luetkens J A, Faron A, et al. Free-breathing non-contrast flow-independent cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using cardiac gated, magnetization-prepared 3D Dixon method:Assessment of thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021, 23(1):91-103.
[25] Gietzen C, Pennig L, Stein J V, et al. Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients:Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography[J]. International Journal of Cardiology, 2023, 390(131203):1-8.
[26] Terwolbeck M N, Zhang S, Bode M, et al. Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for pelvic MR venography in comparison to balanced gradient-echo and T2-weighted spin-echo techniques[J]. Clinical Imaging, 2021, 74:149-155.
[27] 陶黎,朱嵬,张晓宇,等. NCE-MRA对髂静脉压迫综合征的诊断及腔内介入指导[J].中国医疗设备, 2021, 36(10):117-121.